2hr20 of tedium

Monday, May 7th, 2007

Spiderman 3.

It was diabolically awful, especially in comparison to the previous two movies in this trilogy (let’s hope that they don’t make a fourth one, which has been noted as a possibility).

I don’t always agree with movie critics, and I like to make up my own mind on the quality of a movie, but this one should not have been made. Believe me, I do not make such comments lightly.

I had been so eager to see this movie; I’d watched the first two at the cinema, and was intrigued by the suggestion of a darker, black-suited Spiderman. I was imagining something similar to the Red Kryptonite effect on Clark Kent (as seen in Smallville). I was also confident in the acting abilities of Toby McGuire, Kirsten Dunst and James Franco, and felt that it was going to a guaranteed cinematic feast of action and angst.

Unfortunately, my naive anticipations were crushed under the mighty fist of the Sandman, who was just a dad who loved his child… (I bet that Fathers for Justice would love a guy like him on their team!)

I had to agree with the critics that there were too many villians in this film, and the characterisation suffered as a result. The characters became flat caricatures, unsubtle and silly. The only character who had any depth was Harry, the Green Goblin’s son, who became the New Goblin in order to avenge his father’s death…

There was no real need for Venom, he seemed like an afterthought, chucked in to tie up some loose ends. Topher Grace was wasted in this role.

I was unfortunate to have been invited to see the film during a Saturday afternoon, and the cinema was mostly packed with kids. The UK rating for this film was 12A, and that rating was really appropriate. Unlike the previous Spiderman films, which could be enjoyed by older children and adults, this feature seemed to be aimed at juveniles. (The kids in the cinema clapped at the end of the film, at least someone was pleased by it.)

Instead of turning darker or evil, the blacked suited Spidey was simply a bit of a tosser. He strutted around like he was God’s Gift, like some sort of reincarnation of John Travolta in Saturday Night Fever.

The execution of the subplotted love triangle between Peter, MJ and Harry was rather silly too. Why didn’t the director cut out the omelette-making scene, when a sultry exchange between MJ and Harry would have done the job just as well?

The final fight scenes were impressive, but they didn’t make up for the rest of the movie. I couldn’t wait for it to end.

Urban Recluse rating:

-

Something I just noticed:

+ =

2 Responses to “2hr20 of tedium”

  1. 1
    BV:

    Thanks for putting my blog in your list. My post on Spidey 3 is there too.

    BTW, did you ever notice how the first two movies paid homage to the Superman films? The first devoting roughly half of its two hour running time to the origin of the superhero, and the other to a confrontation with an arch nemesis.

    There was even a direct homage to the 1978 Christopher Reeve film when Parker rushed to change before saving his love interest, Mary Jane from falling from a great height, pulling open his shirt to reveal the spider-symbol on his costume, as Clark Kent did while changing to save his love interest, Lois Lane, from falling from a great height.

    And you remember how in Superman II, Superman tries to give up his great powers and responsibility for the love of Lois, but is dragged back in by a threat to the earth? In other words…more-or-less the plot of Spider-Man 2.

    I’m just saying is all.

  2. 2
    PJ:

    Hi BV,

    Thanks for your comment. I haven’t watched the Superman movies for ages, but I’m not surprised that there are so many similarities between the plots of the two franchises.

    In one way the Spiderman movies have been heavily influenced by the classic Superman movies, but also some of the issues you mentioned are part of the standard hero’s journey. For instance, a) there’s the introduction to the hero’s world, the call to action which is frequently ignored until something happens to push the hero to reluctantly answer the call, b) small successes, trials and obstacles in the middle part of the story, then c) the darkest moment, which leads to the final scenes of victory or demise.

    By the way, sorry about my delay in replying to your post, I’ve been out of town for a few weeks…

Leave a Reply